User:Z5016365

From CellBiology
Revision as of 09:52, 24 March 2016 by Z5016365 (talk | contribs)

My Student Page

╔═.♥.══════╗

Jo :)

╚══════.♥.═╝

This is my friend Jo :)

Assessment Tasks


Group Projects
This year's main topic is Blood Cell Biology. Each group should discuss with group members the specific sub-topic that will be covered by their project.

Here is a list of some of the cell types (Structure and Function)

Cell Type (PuMed citations)


Below are the groups to which students have been randomly assigned. You should now on the project discussion page add your own suggestion for a specific topic. Once your group has agreed on the topic, add this as a heading to the project page before Lab 3.


2016 Projects: Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Group 6 | Group 7

Group 1: User:Z5017493 | User:Z3330991 | User:Z5020043 | User:Z5020175 | User:Z3489355

Group 2: User:Z5018320 | User:Z5015980 | User:Z3376375 | User:Z3461106

Group 3: User:Z5019595 | User:Z5019962 | User:Z5018925 | User:Z3461911

Group 4: User:Z5020356 | User:Z3463895 | User:Z3376502 | User:Z3423497 | User:Z5021149

Group 5: User:Z5015719 | User:Z3462124 | User:Z3463953 | User:Z5017292

Group 6: User:Z5018866 | User:Z3329177 | User:Z3465531 | User:Z5105710

Group 7: User:Z5021060 | User:Z5016365 | User:Z5016784 | User:Z3414546 | User:Z3417773

Group Assessment Criteria

Group Assessment Criteria

  1. The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
  2. The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
  3. Content is correctly cited and referenced.
  4. The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
  5. Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
  6. Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of cell biology.
  7. Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki.
  8. Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
  9. The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
  10. Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.
Individual Lab Assessments
Lab 8 Assessment
2016 Lab 8 - Lab 8 Assessment (to be completed before Lab 9)
  1. Add your peer assessment to your own student page to the site.
  2. Add your peer assessment to each project discussion page to the site.
Lab 6 Assessment
2016 Lab 6 -
  1. Identify an antibody against your group blood cell protein that is commercially available.
  2. Add a link to the original data sheet page and identify the type of group blood cell protein.
  3. Include the following information: type of antibody (polyclonal, monoclonal), species raised in, species reacts against, types of application uses, and if available any reference using that antibody.
Lab 2 Assessment
2016 Lab 2 - Super resolution microscopy
  1. Find a recent research article (not review) that uses super resolution microscopy technique.
  2. Write a brief summary of the paper (referenced) and what the super resolution microscopy technique showed.
    1. This should not simply be the abstract of the paper.
    2. This can be 2-3 paragraphs no longer.
  3. Include a super resolution microscopy image from the paper.
    1. Therefore the paper must be from a source that you can reuse.
    2. Image uploaded as in Lab 1 (summary box - description/reference/copyright/student image)
    3. Image should appear as a "thumbnail" (thumb) next to your paper summary (with citation legend) See Test page
Lab 1 Assessment
2016 Lab 1 - Lab 1 Assessment (to be completed before Lab 2) The test page I set up in the Lab
  1. Add your own student page to the site.
  2. Add your signature for Lab attendance.
  3. Add a sub-heading.
  4. Add an external Link.
  5. Add an internal Link.
  6. Add an image from PubMed, PloS or BioMed Central journal related to prokaryote cellular component. Make sure it includes both the reference and copyright information, with the file and where it appears on your page.

Attendance

Z5016365 (talk) 11:54, 10 March 2016 (AEDT)

Z5016365 (talk) 11:11, 17 March 2016 (AEDT)

Lab 1 Assessment

2016 Lab 1

Shortcut Page

Search Pubmed

Prokaryote Cytoskeleton

Eukaryote Cytoskeleton

BioMed Central

How to make an in text citation

Collaborative Protein filaments [1]

PubMed ID

PMID 26271102

PubMed Reference

<pubmed>26271102</pubmed>

Links

Cell Biology Introduction - In Site Link to first Lecture

Test page

External Link

What I've Learnt So Far

Throughout my first laboratory for Cell Biology I've learn the basics for coding my page on the Cell Biology Wiki, the most useful thing I believe that I've found is the automatic reference for PubMed journal articles. I enjoy the coding aspect and believe it to be a useful skill that can be applied later throughout my career. I've also learnt the importance of formatting references and copyright statements and been taught how to produce them efficiently on the Cell Biology Wiki.

Student Image

Here is my uploaded image.

Model of pcDNA-trp-2 Plasmid.jpg

Model of pcDNA:trp-2 1-472 -cA Plasmid[2]

Upload File

Here is my image in 200px wide.

Model of pcDNA-trp-2 Plasmid.jpg

Model of pcDNA:trp-2 1-472 -cA Plasmid[2]

Model of pcDNA:trp-2 1-472 -cA Plasmid[2]

Lab 2 - Microscopy

Assessment

PMID 24576891 - Shedding new light on lipid functions with CARS and SRS microscopy

Summary

File:Linear quantification ability of SRS microscopy.jpg
Linear quantification ability of SRS microscopy[3]

Recent advances in microscopy has removed the previous limitations for scientists in the biomedical field with a greater access to the functions of a cell internally and thus increased the understanding of the pathology of disease and also the cell in a "normal' state to allow comparison. In this article the underlying principles of SRS and CARS microscopy are examined and compared with thought to which technique would be better applied to different situations. CARS and SRS microscopy were also applied to study other macromolecules such as lipids and reviewed, the instructions on how to build a system for the microscopy's was also included in this research paper.

<pubmed>24576891</pubmed>

Links

Cell Membranes and Compartments 1st Lecture

Cell Nucleus 2nd Lecture

2016 Lab 2

References

  1. <pubmed>26271102</pubmed>
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 <pubmed>4696278</pubmed>
  3. <pubmed>24576891</pubmed>