Difference between revisions of "Template:Group Discussion MH"

From CellBiology
Line 1: Line 1:
===Things that need to be Changed on our PAGE===
Ok guys here is a list of things that need to be changed (i went through and got the gist of what everyone was saying)... here goes...
'''Introduction - Esther'''
* Lots more information needed - you need to talk about what the group is going to be talking about
* The syntax and Grammar here is a problem as it doesn't flow. Full sentences need to be used here
* Can we find an image to put of AJ's here at the top of the page too... We can all look for more images
'''History - Alex'''
* Not enough info here - particularly things past 2000 (have a look at my current research section) as well as throughout there is a big 120 year gap.
* more details on each on each dot point.
* any more images?
'''Structure - Tegan'''
* Maybe some minor headings in here... Its pretty much finished except for last grammar and spelling check
'''Function - Alex'''
* Can we add some images in here to help everyone understand the function
* Subheadings will help group the information here
'''Importance and regulation - Esther'''
* Just checking the syntax and grammar here... also make sure there is no "...etc" in the section
'''Abnormalities and Disease - Sal'''
* change title and make sure flows properly
'''Current Research - Sal'''
* Add a Future Studies section
* make sure readable
'''Cell junctions Comparison Table - Tegan'''
* i think they were referring to Gap Junction image here when they said that it didn't have all the Copyright info include3d here.
The gap junction image is from marks lectures, doesnt need copyright. --[[User:Z3292208|z3292208]] 09:48, 19 May 2011 (EST)
'''Glossary and External Links - ALL'''
* add all external links into this section
* add ALL words we can into here and make sure complete!
--[[User:Z3218657|Sally Clarke]] 09:45, 19 May 2011 (EST)
==Week 7==
==Week 7==
* This is the week before the mid-session break.  
* This is the week before the mid-session break.  

Revision as of 09:55, 19 May 2011

Week 7

  • This is the week before the mid-session break.
  • In the lab this week we will have an opportunity to discuss any issues which are slowing progress on your project.
  • The Thursday of the week beginning 02 May will be when all projects will be open to Peer Assessment.
  • What you have on your page by Thursday of that week will be the content that others in the class will comment upon.

Week 6

  1. I see many groups now have subsection titles for their projects.
  2. Here are some searches: Pubmed search all databases junction | PLoS junction | JCB junction You can now simply put your own search term into each top window.
  3. Now's the time to get your images, movies, media etc uploaded. Biomed central | JCB | JCB Archive | PLoS. Once uploaded you can make a gallery on either your project or discussion page using <gallery>File:name here</gallery> tags with your image files listed between the tags. When you upload project images, add this text as it appears replacing # with your own Group number to the summary information [[Category:2011Project#]].
  4. Shown below are the criteria that will be used to assess your final project.

Group Assessment Criteria

  • The key points relating to the topic that your group was allocated are clearly described.
  • The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
  • Content is correctly cited and referenced.
  • The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student’s own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
  • Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
  • Relates the topics and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of cell biology.
  • Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer’s wiki.
  • Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
  • The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
  • Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with this sites wiki guidelines.

By Week 5

Each Group member has added to the discussion page:

  1. A Review Article
  2. A Historic Research Article
  3. A Current Research Article

No two students should add the same paper and there should be a link to the original article.