ANAT3231 Projects 2012

From CellBiology
Revision as of 14:30, 24 May 2012 by Z8600021 (talk | contribs) (Group Assessment Criteria 2011)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is information on the Cell Biology group project topics available for student project work commencing 2012. Group and Individual project work will also be linked from the 2011 student page. To begin working on your online project Editing Basics describes simple editing. Both these links are on every page left side navigation menu.

--Z8600021 11:06, 9 January 2012 (EST) The previous criteria shown below are currently under review and are provided for information purposes only.

Group Assessment Criteria 2012

  • The key points relating to the topic that your group was allocated are clearly described.
  • The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
  • Content is correctly cited and referenced.
  • The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student’s own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
  • Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
  • Relates the topics and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of cell biology.
  • Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer’s wiki.
  • Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
  • The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
  • Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with this sites wiki guidelines.

Project Pages

Student Groups

Students absent from lab 3 were replaced with those attending. If you have been changed from your previous group, you now need to contact the course coordinator to be reallocated to a group project.


Group 1

User:Z3333204

User:Z3333864

User:Z3289558

User:Z3332676

Group 2

User:Z3186755

User:Z3254758

User:Z3336156

User:Z3332327

Group 3

User:z3253205

User:Z3378280

User:Z3253205

User:Z3407326

Group 4

User:Z3287603

User:Z3289642

User:Z3330968

User:Z3290558

Group 5

User:z3332227

User:Z3290649

User:Z3289738

User:Z3336051

Group 6

User:Z3284634

User:Z3291200

User:Z3333794

User:Z3333427

Group 7

User:Z3332863

User:Z3333208

User:Z3411306

User:Z3333865

Group 8

User:Z3288970

User:Z3254598

User:Z3217686

User:z3223095

Group 9

User:Z3272558

User:Z3272212

User:Z3293029

User:Z3331812

Lab 2 Project Work

  • On your discussion page talk to your group members and reach consensus on a signalling topic.
  • Once done begin mapping out your project structure and how you will go about dividing the work.


Lab 3 Project Work

  • You have now selected a signalling pathway.
  • Discuss with your group who is researching which sub-section.
  • Identify 4 papers (articles or reviews) that relate to your topic. These should be added to the discussion page and also to your individual page (as part of this week's assessment).

Lab 4 Project Work

  • Have sub-headings added to your project page.
  • Allocate sub-section work on your discussion page. There must be clear interaction from all group members on this page.
  • Commence uploading content that related to your signalling topic. Remember that all files uploaded must have your group category as described in the Lab.

Lab 5 Project Work

Links: ANAT3231 Projects 2011


Lab 7

Entrez

Biomed Central

Journals

Journals

Lab 9

Individual Assessment - Peer project review.


Plagiarism

Currently all students originally assigned to each group are listed as equal authors/contributors to their project. If you have not contributed the content you had originally agreed to, nor participated in the group work process, then you should contact the course coordinator immediately and either discuss your contribution or request removal from the group author list. Remember that all student online contributions are recorded by date, time and the actual contributed content. A similar email reminder of this information was sent to all current students.

Please note the Universities Policy regarding Plagiarism

In particular this example:

"Claiming credit for a proportion of work contributed to a group assessment item that is greater than that actually contributed;"

Academic Misconduct carries penalties. If a student is found guilty of academic misconduct, the penalties include warnings, remedial educative action, being failed in an assignment or excluded from the University for two years.