Difference between revisions of "2010 Questionnaire"
(→Introduction) |
(→Introduction) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I would though prefer something more substantial in response, do not alter other student's contributions. | I would though prefer something more substantial in response, do not alter other student's contributions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===Question 1 - The course covered most of the topics that I thought would be part of Cell Biology=== | ===Question 1 - The course covered most of the topics that I thought would be part of Cell Biology=== | ||
− | Agree | + | Agree - Would like lecture content to cover the different cell biology techniques and their clinical implications. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===Question 2 - I found the online lecture notes useful in my study=== | ===Question 2 - I found the online lecture notes useful in my study=== | ||
− | Strongly | + | |
+ | Strongly agree - Lectures are succinct and available anytime. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===Question 3 - I found the ilecture audio useful in my study=== | ===Question 3 - I found the ilecture audio useful in my study=== | ||
− | Strongly Agree | + | Strongly Agree - Excellent revision tool. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 25: | Line 42: | ||
− | Strongly Agree | + | Strongly Agree - Dr. Hill simplified the lectures for easier understanding. Guest lecturers and lab demonstrators gave us an insight into their specific field of research. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===Question 5 - The assessment methods are useful learning experiences=== | ===Question 5 - The assessment methods are useful learning experiences=== | ||
− | Strongly Agree | + | Strongly Agree - The assessment methods for this course are excellent for supplementing group and individual learning. Importantly, there are not too many assessments, encouraging quality rather than quantity. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 35: | Line 64: | ||
− | Strongly Agree | + | Strongly Agree - Allows for a combined team effort at the convinience of each group member. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 41: | Line 76: | ||
− | Strongly Agree | + | Strongly Agree - Lectures available anytime. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 11:41, 6 June 2010
Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 1.1 Question 1 - The course covered most of the topics that I thought would be part of Cell Biology
- 1.2 Question 2 - I found the online lecture notes useful in my study
- 1.3 Question 3 - I found the ilecture audio useful in my study
- 1.4 Question 4 - The lecturers in this course provided interesting and clear lectures
- 1.5 Question 5 - The assessment methods are useful learning experiences
- 1.6 Question 6 - I prefer an online group project to an equivalent group poster/written project
- 1.7 Question 7 - I would use an online Wiki page for my course notes if available
- 1.8 Any general comments about the course?
Introduction
This does not form part of your individual assessment, but I would very much appreciate constructive feedback on the current course. If you have time, could you provide some answers the following questions. I will not be identifying specific student contributions to this page. Simply add your response under the question and any additional comment you would like to make that relates to the question.
- You can use the usual: Strongly Agree | Mildly Agree | Agree | Mildly Disagree | Strongly Disagree
I would though prefer something more substantial in response, do not alter other student's contributions.
Question 1 - The course covered most of the topics that I thought would be part of Cell Biology
Agree - Would like lecture content to cover the different cell biology techniques and their clinical implications.
Question 2 - I found the online lecture notes useful in my study
Strongly agree - Lectures are succinct and available anytime.
Question 3 - I found the ilecture audio useful in my study
Strongly Agree - Excellent revision tool.
Question 4 - The lecturers in this course provided interesting and clear lectures
Strongly Agree - Dr. Hill simplified the lectures for easier understanding. Guest lecturers and lab demonstrators gave us an insight into their specific field of research.
Question 5 - The assessment methods are useful learning experiences
Strongly Agree - The assessment methods for this course are excellent for supplementing group and individual learning. Importantly, there are not too many assessments, encouraging quality rather than quantity.
Question 6 - I prefer an online group project to an equivalent group poster/written project
Strongly Agree - Allows for a combined team effort at the convinience of each group member.
Question 7 - I would use an online Wiki page for my course notes if available
Strongly Agree - Lectures available anytime.
Any general comments about the course?
-Terrific course, excellent assessment format, incorporates team work with individual study well. To improve the course, revision lectures with previous exam questions would be good. Thanx Dr. Hill.