--Julianna Lam 05:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
lab 2: - the light region in the nucleus are the chromosomes.
--Julianna Lam 05:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
lab 3: question - How do we know the hazards associated with research chemicals? answer - by looking at the Material Safety Data Sheet ( MSDS )
--Julianna Lam 05:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
lab 4: question- a commercial antibody against an adhesion protein
ALCAM antibody, is a monoclonal antibody
--Julianna Lam 06:15, 21 April 2010 (UTC) lab 6
--Julianna Lam 07:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC) lab 7: advantages : oil- provides the highest ultimate optical performance water- limits aberration air-
--Julianna Lam 06:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
--Julianna Lam 06:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
lab 8 : i forgot to add the my peer review onto my own student page before but here it is :
--Julianna Lam 01:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC) great page guys ! the page is nicely organised with a nice mixture of pictures. the page has a logically flow to it and i especially liked the current research part. the variety of examples given made the page very interesting. The content of the text is well thought out. one thing you may want to change is to add a glossary to help readers understand more in depth.
--Julianna Lam 01:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC) the page looks really good. great use of pictures, made the page look very interesting. the history section is very thorough and clear. the use of the table listing the advantages and disadvantages are a good idea. although more attention should be paid towards the referencing. overall its a very good job !
--Julianna Lam 01:29, 12 May 2010 (UTC) i like the way the page is sectioned, great use of headings.the content of the methodology, applications and limitations is very informative. i think the history section may have too much information, would probably be better if it is set out in a timeline. the pictures are great. more attention needs to be paid towards the referencing. overall, great page !
--Julianna Lam 01:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC) the introduction is too short, would like it to have a few more sentences. the use of pictures and the table comparing the two is amazing, made the page more interesting. the 'how it works' bit is written very well, content was interesting and easy to understand. i think the history section should go under the introduction and before the 'how it works bit'. overall, great page !
--Julianna Lam 01:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC) i think an introduction is necessary to introduce the topic. the use of pictures is good, especially liked the self drawn picture. the timeline and development should probably go before the uses of it. overall it looks good, good job !
--Julianna Lam 01:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC) hi guys ! the page looks terrific !!! it definitely shows how much work and thought you put into it. the content in the methodology, limitations and history section is really good int eh way that it is informative and easy to understand. the flow of the page is great. the page looks interesting, makes me want to read it. for improvement, i think the history section may be a little bit too long. the self drawn picture is great. glossary section could also be longer ! good job !
--Julianna Lam 02:47, 12 May 2010 (UTC) the defintion should go under the introduction.history is a bit short, would be good to go more in depth. the use of the table is really good, makes it easier to read. the content is informative. i liked the challenges section, though i think the word limitations sound better. i liked the use of the graphics and chart. overall good job !
--Julianna Lam 01:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC) great page guys. might contain too much information, having said that the content of the information is very informative. the use of pictures is good although it would be good to see pictures at the start of the page to make it look more appealing to read. some of the information under the historys heading, would be good to put it under a separate heading so it doesnt look as cluttered.
--Julianna Lam 01:57, 12 May 2010 (UTC) the page is great ! it has a logical flow, great use of pictures, headings, tables, flow chart. content is great, the glossary provided is great.
lab 9 : the technological bottleneck common to all next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms is the long length of time needed for DNA library preparation.
--Julianna Lam 06:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
--Julianna Lam 06:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)