2014 Group 3 Project

From CellBiology

UNSW ANAT3231 Course Coordinator Dr Mark Hill
2014 Projects: Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4

Nucleocytoplasmic Transport


Ring-like Nuclear Pores spanning across the Nuclear Envelope.

The nuclear envelope shares an analogous structure to the plasma membrane and other membrane-enclosed organelles. It is a phospholipid bilayer that is composed of two layers, the outer and inner membrane, which act as a barrier for pathogens or other proteins that would disturb gene expression. The outer membrane faces the cytoplasm and is closely associated with the rough endoplasmic reticulum. The inner membrane faces the nucleoplasmic side which supports and interacts with filaments of the nuclear lamina. As the nuclear membrane is only permeable to some small molecules, the nuclear envelope has a special channel that permits different types of molecules to cross the membrane. These pores in the membrane allow for bidirectional transport of large ribosomal subunits, proteins and other large molecules with the help of a transport receptor known as a karyopherin. This channel has its specificities and a particular way of functioning that controls the exchange of macromolecules between the cytoplasm and the nucleoplasm and it is known as the Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC) which is made up of small proteins called nucleoporins. Transport is also facilitated by heterotrimeric G proteins; in particular, Ran which helps accommodate the direction of the molecules. Although the nuclear envelope is an exceptional mediator, there are certain proteins that do not need the help of transport receptors to pass through the nuclear pore complex.

Additional Links

Nuclear Envelope Representation

Nuclear Envelope


Date Significant Discovery
1913 The structure of the nuclear Envelope was first described as a double membrane that encloses the nucleus.[1]
1950 Electron microscopy revealed that the nuclear envelope had two layers,a continuous internal layer and an outer porous layer.[2]
1955 Watson established that the nuclear envelope is closely linked with the endoplasmic reticulum when observing under electron microscopy of interphase cells.[3]
1965 Feldherr discovered that the maximum amount of angstroms to pass through the NPCs was approximately 125 to 145 angstroms in diameter.[4]

1980 The short basic classical-NLS was first discovered as well as their karyopherin-bound structures.[5]
1989 Researcher,Hans Ris was in search for the function and structure of nuclear pore complexes but instead found the specific structures which was termed nucleoporins. Nucleoporins were discovered using high resolution electron microscopy.[6]
1993 Ran GTPase was first discovered and was found to have a strong link to nucleocytoplasmic transport of ran-dependent proteins and transcription factors.[7]
2000 Rout et al provided data to support the brownian virtual gate model as the most preferred model to demonstrate transport across the nuclear membrane for both small and large molecules.[8]


Scaffolding Nup188 structure with ARM and HEAT repeats[9]

Nucleoporins (nups) are the basic building blocks of Nuclear Pore Complexes which span across the Nuclear Envelope allowing for directional transport(active and facilitated). There are different types of nucleoporins that make up the nuclear pore complex, each with their own diverse role. Some nucleoporins are involved in scaffolding and some are involved in forming the octagonal symmetrical hole for both small and large molecules to pass through [8]. The way to identify a nup is it's molecular weight in kDa (kilodaltons), e.g. nup140. By identifying the molecular weight, one is able to tell whether or not that specific nucleoporin is involved in scaffolding or transport[8]. Most nucleoporins contain an N-terminal and C-terminal with Armadillo (ARM) and HEAT Repeats which are helical solenoid protein domains which are commonly found in cytoplasmic proteins with functions in transport[9].

Nucleoporins and Their Localisation Across the NPC[10]
Vertebrate and Yeast Nucleoporins Table[11]
Vertebrate Nucleoporin Homologous Yeast Nucleoporin Localisation Motifs
Nup153b Nup1 (114) nuclear FXFG
Nup62 Nsp1 (87) symmetrical FG, FXFG
Nup50 Nup2 (78) nuclear-biased FXFG
NLP1/hCG1 (45) Nup42 cytoplasmic FG
Nup58, Nup45 Nup49 symmetrical GLFG, FG
Nup35 Nup53 symmetrical
Nup35 Nup59 symmetrical
Nup54 Nup57 symmetrical GLFG, FG
Nup88 Nup82 cytoplasmic
Nup107 Nup84 symmetrical
Nup75/Nup85 Nup 85 symmetrical
Nup93 Nic 96 symmetrical
Nup98 Nup100 cytoplasmic-biased GLFG
Nup98 Nup 116 cytoplasmic-biased FG, GLFG
Nup98 Nup145N (60) nuclear-biased GLFG
Nup160 Nup120 symmetrical
Nup133 Nup133 symmetrical
Nup96 Nup145C (85) symmetrical
Nup155 Nup157 symmetrical
Nup155 Nup 170 symmetrical
Nup214/CAN Nup159 cytoplasmic FG

Phenylalanine and Glycine Rich Nuclear Pores (FG-Nups)

Molecular Charged GFPs Passing through NPC[12]

Phenylalanine and Glycine Rich Nuclear Pores (FG-Nups) have repeat amino acid (AA) sequences in 13 out of 30 currently discovered Nucleoporins. These FG-nups contain extensive regions of FG repeats (FG/FXFG/GLFG) spanning from 200 to 700 AA long sequences which is important for selective passage. FG Repeat Motifs are important due to their hydrophobic binding sites attaching to certain cargo transporting receptors (karyopherins/transportins/importins)[13]. The structure of FG-Nups is intrinsically disordered and are always dynamic in vitro, and cannot be fully assessed due to their sheer size and their position within the nuclear membrane[14]. It was revealed that size is a huge factor rather than molecular charge, in determining passive diffusion of small molecules through the Nuclear Pore Complex(NPC)[12]. For passive diffusion, molecules that are less than 9 nanometers (nm) in diameter and are <40 kDa are able to diffuse through the NPCs[15]. By coating Gold balls with Complex-cargo coating and incubating it in Transport Receptor solution, it is found that large molecules roughly 39nm in diameter are able to enter the karyoplasm through facilitated transport with these Nuclear Localisation Sequences [15]. This also goes hand in hand with the theory that the central axial hole within the NPC is ~410 Angstroms (A) or 41 nm wide in diameter[16].

Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC)

NPC Models

Nuclear Pore Complexes are biologically integral in the export and import of large ribosomal proteins, subunits and various proteins involved in oncogenesis, gene expression and other nuclear activities. NPCs are crucial in transport, as they have to selectively transit ~600,000 different macromolecules every minute in a single eukaryotic cell[17]. For many years, biologists have researched numerous mechanisms as to how macromolecules can be transported in and out of Nucleocytoplasmic barrier. However, difficulties in obtaining a clear and accurate model of the specific transport were faced due to the dynamic arrangement of the disordered FG-Nups and the various interactions that occur within the NPC. Currently, there are four accepted models which aim to account for the selective permeability of the NPC, the interactions of transport receptors with the FG-Nups and the different conduits in the NPC that allow for diffusion and translocation[18].

These models include:

Brownian Virtual Gate Model

1) The Brownian Virtual Gate Model

The virtual gate model implies that the intrinsically disordered FG-Nups behave like ‘repulsive bristles’ which creates an entropic barrier on both ends of the nuclear pore complex.[19] This entropic barrier repels large cargo particles due to the ‘push’ that the FG-Nups provide in keeping the large cargoes away from the central channel. However, this repulsion can be overcome if transport receptors bind to the FG-Nups whereby nuclear pore channels become open and permeable, ultimately allowing large cargos to enter the NPC[20]. According to Rout et al, the most accepted model for nuclear transport is the Brownian virtual gate model.[8]

Selective Phase Model

2) The Selective Phase Model

The selective phase model suggests that the central channel of the NPC is saturated with FG-nups in which the FG repeats are linked together via hydrophobic interactions to form a sieve-like meshwork. This allows only small molecules to pass via passive diffusion therefore restricting the entry of large molecules. When transport factors bind to these FG motifs, it breaks the hydrophobic interactions between the FG-repeats, therefore allowing complete translocation of the macromolecule[18].

Reduction of Dimensionality Model

3) The Reduction of Dimensionality Model

The reduction of dimensionality model suggests that the FG motifs line the internal surface of the NPC which act as binding sites for transport receptors and the cargo they carry on-board.[21] The transport receptors then bind to the FG-repeats and then continuously proceed to the inner surface with a random 2D walk carrying their cargo molecules with them until they enter or exit the nucleus[18].

Forest Model

4) The Forest Model

The forest model proposes that the FG-repeats in the FG-Nups present two different conformations. These FG-Nups are classified into “shrubs” which are said to have a collapsed-coil conformation with cohesive FG domains and low charge, as well as “trees” which present itself as an extended coil with FG domains being non-cohesive and having a high charge.[22] These conformations therefore lead to a forest type structure in the central channel due to the formation of a central and peripheral pathway for the transport of large and small molecules respectively.[23]

Nuclear Transport Receptors

Importin Structure and Binding Complexes

Karyopherins are a family of proteins that have the function of transporting proteins, RNAs and other macromolecules to the nucleus or cytoplasm through the Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC). By binding with nucleoporins, these nucleocytoplasmic transport receptors can travel through the nuclear envelope depending on the type of nuclear transport receptor attached. The family is divided into two groups: importins and exportins. There are more importins than exportins receptors[24]and a limited number of karyopherins altogether. Each one of the karyopherins has multiple cargoes it can transport. It is also understood that distinct associations are formed with different substrates[25]. When it binds to a cargo molecule aiming to take it from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, the transport mediator is called exportins, whereas when it goes the opposite way they are called importins. There are also two bi-directional receptors found so far and one that has not been characterised yet[26]. All the karyopherins have similar molecular weight, which varies from 95 to 145 kDa, and a structure that is very alike[27].The Karyopherin Superfamily of transport receptors are made up of tandem HEAT repeats, usually containing ~18 HEAT repeat motifs in their structure [28]. The HEAT Repeats continuously stack on top of each other and create a superhelical structure made up of three important domains: N-terminal Ran-binding site, nucleoporin-binding site and C-terminal cargo-binding site[29].Within the Nucleoporin structure are repeat FG Domains that have a binding site specific to karyopherins for transport across the nuclear membrane[30]. Additionally, the possible substrate must present a signal that has to be either the Nuclear Localisation Signal (NLS) or the Nuclear Export Signal (NES), in order to go towards the nucleus or cytoplasm respectively. Also the Karyopherins:cargo complex transport is regulated by RanGTP/GDP cycle.[31]

Importins and Binding Sites of Cargo

NLS alignment of p50 peptide with Imp-α Family[32]

A Nuclear Localisation Sequence (NLS) is a sequence within a protein that binds specifically to an importin/karyopherin for transport from the cytoplasm to the karyoplasm. A classical signal sequence is PKKKRRV[33]. The NLS can bind to multiple transport receptors but can have a higher affinity for certain karyopherins. An example would be the N50 peptide extracted from the NLS of NFκB1/p50, and that it can bind to multiple importins but has higher affinity binding to importin α5 (Imp α5)[32]. It is said that importin-α works mostly as an adaptor that can recognise a range of classical NLSs[34] and cannot transport most cargo molecules without attaching to it's counterpart Importin-β[35]. A protein that bears a NLS is recognised by importin-α, the latter which then binds with importin-β and thus form a heterotrimeric complex consisting of Cargo/Importin-α/Importin-β. The importin-β on the complex then interacts with the nucleoporins in the NPC[35] and regulates the affinity of the cargo with the heterotrimer[36]. The transport of Cargo molecules does not need the Importin-α to bind to the cargo molecule and can just be transported by Importin-β by itself[24] by recognising what is known as a "nonclassical" NLS. In this case the binding does not require an adaptor for translocation[37]. In both cases RanGTP binds to importin-β in the nucleus, the substrate is released[38], and the importins returns to the cytoplasm without the cargo and it is not essential for GTP hydrolysis by Ran to occur for the exportation of the karyopherin[39][40].

Exportins and their Cargo Binding Sites

NES binding within the CRM1 Helices HEAT repeats 11 and 12[41]
CRM1 and its Modulation, Cargo Binding and Release into the Cytoplasm[41]

The most studied exportin is Chromosome Region Maintenance Protein 1 (Crm1/Exportin-β), which is found in both yeast and human cells which exports cargo containing leucine-rich nuclear export signals(NES)[42]. A typical example of a non-classical sequence is LQLPPLERLTL which is frequently found in NESs[43]. CRM1 has a structure of 21 tandem HEAT repeats and has binding sites to RanGTP on its N Terminal[41]. Although Crm1 has low affinity for Ran-GTP and NES, when all three hybridise they form a stable complex[44]that will cross the NPC towards the cytoplasm, where the protein is released[45] as RanGTP is hydrolysed to RanGDP[46]. The Leucine Rich NES on the protein weakly fits due to its helical structure in between the hydrophobic gap between two CRM1 outer helices[47].

List of karyopherins[26]
Mammalian karyopherins S.cerevisiae karyopherins Function Cargo molecules
Importin-β Kap95p They control cell cycle regulation transcription factors Swi4p, Swi6p and Mbp1p.
Importin-4 Kap123p Controls cytoskeletal regulation Nbp1p
Importin-9 Kap114p Kap114p plays a role in nucleosome assembly via its interactions with histones H2A/H2B as well as the histone chaperone Nap1p. Mammalian importin-9 plays a role in the regulation of gene expression. Importin-9 imports actin and Kap114p imports TFIIB.
RanBP5 Pse1p/Kap121p They play a role in importing transcription factors which regulate the mating of haploids Pse1p imports Ste12p and RanBP5 imports newly synthesized polymerase.
Exportin-5 Msn5p/Kap142p Msn5p is involved in the adaptation of cells in various environmental conditions whereas exportin-5 is involved in the export of double-stranded RNA binding domain proteins and double-stranded RNAs cargos. Mammalian exportin-5 exports double-stranded RNAs and proteins whereas S. cerevisiae Msn5p imports and exports cargo proteins such as Far1p and Swi5p. It also exports tRNAs.
Los1p/exportin-t Los1p/exportin-t Mediates the nuclear export of tRNAs tRNA
CAS/CSE1L Cse1p Cse1p Is Involved in Export of Yeast Importin α. importin-α
Importin-13 - Serves to function in Meiosis Imports ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 9.
CRM1/Exportin-1 KAP124 Mediates intracellular regulation of many cellular processes such as early mammalian embryogenesis Exports leucine-rich nuclear export signals.

Additional Link to More Karyopherins and their Alternative Names[48]

Karyopherins List

Karyopherins and their Specific Cargos

Karyopherins Transporting Cargos Across NPC

The first part shows an Importin-α/Importin-β mediated transport. The blue is the NLS signaling cargo, which goes from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where the RanGTP binds to the receptor thus releasing the cargo. The second part is the NES signaling cargo (blue) binding to the exportin and the complex which then bind to RanGTP (red). Once they form a trimeric complex, they cross the NPC and the RanGTP is hydrolysed by RanBP1 or RanBP2 and the cargo is released in the cytoplasm.

The media player is loading...

G-Protein Involved in Directional Transport and Cargo Uncoupling of Karyopherin-Cargo Complexes

Ran is a G-Protein that belongs to the Ras superfamily which belongs to another group of hydrolysis enzymes. The key features of G Proteins are their G-Domains in their protein structure which usually are involved with nucleotide exchange, especially the nucleotide Guanine. Ran has a Triphosphate and Diphosphate state known as RanGTP and RanGDP respectively. RanGTP is mostly predominant within the karyoplasm of a cell and is involved in regulation, disassociation and also protein translocation of large cargos. Due to the nature of RanGTP, it forms an association with Impβ1/Impα-mediated nuclear import and/or Impβ1-mediated nuclear import that have passed through the Nuclear Pore Complex from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. RanGTP then binds to these nuclear import proteins and disassociates the cargo from the receptors[49]. The export of large cargoes through Exportin Proteins is analogous in function to its homologous neighbor, Importins. The exportin protein only shows high affinity with the cargo molecule in the presence of RanGTP, which speeds the process of binding to form a trimeric complex which then
RanGTP and RanGDP Dissociating Cargoes [48]
proceeds to interact with the Nucleoporins within the NPC and is released into the cytoplasm of the cell. RanGTP is hydrolysed to RanGDP with the assistance of RAN GTPase activating Protein (ranGAP)and its cofactor Ran-binding protein 1 (ranBP1) which dissociates the Exportin Protein from the cargo in the cytoplasm to perform their respective function[48]. RanGDP is regulated and converted into RanGTP by another protein known as RCC1 or RanGEF, which is localised within the nucleoplasm [50]. This cycling process is know as the RanGTP/GDP cycle.

Within the cell, RanGTP accumulates within the nucleoplasm for complex breakdown of the importin and the cargo, while on the other side of the membrane, RanGDP is predominantly found within the cytoplasm of the cell where it dissociates the large cargos transported out of the nucleus. Weis and Nachury determined that RanGTP also played a role in directionality by inverting the gradient by putting RanGTP in the cytoplasm rather than the karyoplasm [51].It is functionally important that RanGTP is localised within the karyoplasm of the cell, as it is biologically paramount in directionality of macromolecular transport since it disassociates the Importin-Cargo Complex. Within the Nuclear Pore Complex, there were no sightings of ran-binding sites on the nucleoporins except for the nonessential nup2p, further implicating that RanGTP has no social interactions with the Nuclear Pore Complex and is only rather for dissociating the transport receptors from the complex molecule and acting as a transport gradient[8]. In essence this further supports the idea of Brownian diffusion model supported by a selective gating channel.

Nuclear Import and Export with the Assistance and Description of RanGTP and RanGDP Function The media player is loading...

IMP and Ran-independent nuclear import pathways


Carrier-independent transport of β-catenin.

β-catenin, also known as Catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1, 88kDa is an essential protein that serves to control the coordination of cell–cell adhesion and gene transcription. It plays a critical role in the WNT signalling pathway, whereby the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin stimulates the signal transduction. [52] It had previously been thought that β-catenin travelled through the Nuclear Pore complex to enter the nucleus via the formation of a complex with the LEF/TCF family, one that doesn't have a NLS sequence. [53]However, experiments have shown that the rapid migration of β-catenin into the nucleus is independent of soluble factors such as the cytosolic extract, Ran or the hydrolysis of ATP/GTP. This revealed that β-catenin can accumulate into the nucleus in a Ran-unassisted manner which is similar to the mechanisms of transport seen in importin α/β and transportin. [54] Both β-Catenin and importin β possess tandem repeating motifs which are called Armadillo and HEAT respectively. These repeats are structurally similar and bind directly to the FXGF-repeats of the Yeast nucleoporins NUP1, suggesting that they travel into the nucleus through the interaction on the same site of the NPC. [55] As such, the transport of the protein β-catenin into the nuclear pore complex is independent of RAN signalling pathways and can freely accumulate into the nucleus for its respective functions.

SMAD transcription factors

The receptor regulated SMADs serve as transcription factors which enable transcription of collagen type I during the fibrogenesis of hepatic stellate cells in the liver and hair morphogenesis in animals.[56] For transcription to occur, these SMAD transcription factors must be activated by cellular receptors and dimerise through phosphorylation by which they can bind to a specific DNA motif as they enter the nucleus. SMAD transcription factors employ two methods to enter the nucleus, one of which uses karyopherins to interact with the nucleoporins, such as the binding of importin-α to importin-β and the subsequent recognition of the NLS motifs labelled on the cargo which allows the importin-β-importin-α-cargo complex to enter the nucleus via the NPC.[57] The other route requires no energy or carrier molecules, but instead uses direct interaction of the SMAD transcription factors to the Nucleoporins. The hydrophobic region in the SMAD MH2 domain binds to the FG-motifs on the specific nucleoporins Nup153 and Nup214.[58] This binding mechanism enables the SMAD transcription factors to sweep its way from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where they can then bind to DNA motifs to initiate transcription.


ERK2 is the abbreviated term for extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 and belongs to the family of mitogen-activated protein kinases. It contributes significantly to the regulation of various cellular mechanisms such as the proliferation, differentiation, and survival of cells. [59] The characteristic that makes ERK2 unique to other kinases is its ability to rapidly accumulate in the nucleus without depending on mechanisms that rely on energy and carrier molecules for importation. Experimental data has shown that the transport of ERK2 is a facilitated mechanism that requires the direct binding of ERK2 to the FG-repeats that are bound to their associated nucleoporins.[60] ERK2 is also known to bind to multiple NPC proteins such as Nup214 and Nup153, further supporting the ERK2-FG-nup driven mechanism for transport from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Furthermore, the type of state that the ERK2 molecule exhibits, greatly affects the mechanism as to how it enters and exits the nucleus. ERK2 in the unphosphorylated state travels to the nucleus by an energy-independent process which is carried out by its direct interaction with nucleoporins.[61] Likewise, small concentrations of phosphorylated ERK2 can be imported and exported from the nucleus via an energy- and carrier-independent process. However, highly concentrated phosphorylated ERK2 undergoes an energy driven process that requires the interaction of CRM-1, which uses karyopherin-β family members such as importin-beta and exportins.[62] As such, the transport of ERK2 in and out of the nucleus can occur via two mechanisms that either requires or doesn’t require energy. Yet, the energy-independent method of transport is more efficient and enables the rapid transport of ERK2 into the nucleus.


Transport of STAT molecules via both carrier-independent(A) and carrier-dependent pathways(B).[63]

The STAT protein, which is also known as signal transducer and activator of transcription, controls various cellular processes including the growth, survival and differentiation of cells. They can also serve to function as transcription factors if they are phosphorylated by Janus kinase (JAK), whereby they can then enter the nucleus to bind to the gamma-activated sites (GAS) of the DNA to promote transcription of cytokine-inducible genes.[64] However, this process requires the use of karyopherins, which specifically uses carrier molecules such as importin-α5 to enter the nucleus.[65] Nevertheless, Stat proteins and transcription factors can enter the nucleus via carrier-independent pathways if the stat protein or transcription factor exists in an unphosphorylated state. The nuclear translocation of Stat1, Stat3, and Stat5 in its unphosphorylated state can occur via the direct binding of the stat protein or transcription factor to the FG-repeats of Nup153 and Nup214.[63] As such, this leads to the rapid transport of the STAT protein or transcription factor making the nucleus completely saturable.

Diseases involved with NPCs

Once the structure of the nuclear pore complex and function is known, it’s possible to analyse the diseases associated with the specific defected nucleoporins that normally span the entire NPC complex. Diseases related to the altered nucleoporins involve various types of cancer, viral infections, neuro-degeneration and cardiovascular diseases. Below is a list of some of the various diseases that can occur via defects associated with the nucleoporins.

Affected Nucleoporin Description
Nup88 This protein belongs to the nucleoporins family and forms a dynamic subcomplex with the oncogenic nucleoporin CAN/Nup214.[66] It acts as a nuclear exporter of activated NF-kappaB transcription factors, ultimately leading to the nuclear accumulation of NF-kappaB.[67] Overexpression of the Nup88 leads to its invasive state in tumour cells. It is commonly found that the overexpression of Nup88 is dominant in breast and colon hepatic cancer as well as many other colorectal cancers.[68] Both diseases can be life threatening if not diagnosed and treated at early stages.
Nup98 The Nup98 protein functions to provide a docking site for the transport of certain substrates. It is associated with the fusion of several genes involving chromosome translocations in acute myelogenous.[69] Since this nucleoporin plays an important role in RNA export from the nucleus,[70] some diseases have been related to the malfunction of Nup98. For instance, myeloid and lymphoid malignancies[71] , a genetic disorder that affects expression of Nup98 gene; and vesicular stomatitis, a virus disease in which the pathogen interacts with this nucleoporin[72] and blocks RNA exportation from nucleus, thus providing a better environment for the virus to replicate. Also, a mutation in the translocation process of Nup98 with HOXA9 is seen in leukemia, whereby this mutation affects the expression of oncogenes and prevents hematopoietic cell differentiation.[73]
Nup62 Nup 62 can be used as an indicator by acting as an autoantigen for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, an autoimmune disease which often results in inflammation of target organs[74]. Due to Nup62 having a flexible protein FG Repeat Domain compared to other Nucleoporins (e.g. Scaffolding Nups), and that it is a glycoprotein, this might be the cause of why Nup62 has high immunogenicity[75][76]. Nup62 might also be closely associated with billiary cirrhosis by serving as a marker[77], much like Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Nup143 and p62 These nucleoporins are related to import of material from cytoplasm to nucleus. Some viruses degradate these proteins and thus attenuate the immune response, achieving a high replication rate.[73]

Future Research

Future research regarding the transport from the cytoplasm to the nucleus is mainly revolved around unpacking the assemblage and function of the NPC. Researchers are interested in discovering other nucleoporins which are currently unknown and analyse their structure in comparison to other nucleoporins. They also want to understand how these nucleoporins may relate to transport, gene expression, cell regulation and pathological diseases. Also, modifying nucleoporins to allow the transport of various cargos is also an interesting topic of research. Some studies includes:

Karyopherins as Biological Markers for Delayed Graft Function

Karyopherin nuclear transport could possibly be a biological marker for Delayed Graft Function(DGF). It was found that after renal transplant NLS nuclear import was the biggest upregulated pathway that occurred and tests also revealed significant translocation of Importin-α. There are too little patients to completely analyse how much an affect, or if there is any correlation between the large amount of NLS substrates being translocated to the nucleus to DGF. Further pharmacological studies can be procured if given enough information on the types of NLS cargo, and ultimately can be used to predict whether or not DGF could possibly affect the patient before renal transplant has even taken place.[78]

Nucleoporins forming the Nuclear Pore Complex possibly related to Herpes Virus Nuclear Envelope Budding

Nucleoporins that make up the cylindrically structured Nuclear Pore COmplex could have a role to play in Nuclear Envelope Budding. The herpes virus usually comes into contact with the Nuclear Lamina which is only presented according to the NE Budding Model, which is now widely accepted, and the granules of the nuclear envelope affected by the budding is spatially proximal to the NPC. Research can still be done here to find a correlation between the granules and certain nucleoporins within the NPC that could possibly interact with each other. By effectively studying the interactions by dynamic imaging or other means, further study can be done to assess the mechanisms involved in membrane bending.[79]

The absence and presence of endogenous mediators that regulate karyopherins related to clinical allergic conditions

There is current research focused on whether the mechanism that controls importins and exportins are related to allergic diseases. Future research suggests that studying the nucleocytoplasmic transport of the transcription factors, Foxp3 and T-bet could be the next big step to finding links to the allergic immune response. Also, mutations and polymorphisms in importin molecules as well as the mechanisms controlling these karyopherins, could provide an alternative method to comprehend how defects in karyopherins can stimulate the allergic response. It is essential to study these components in order to develop therapeutic approaches that can control the immune response by narrowing down the specific targets that are involved in the process.[48]


Amino acid – building blocks of protein.

Angstroms – measure of distance, 10−10 m .

Armadillo (ARM) repeats – are repetitive amino acid sequence which are approximately 40 amino acids long and are found in β-catenin.

FG-Nups - Phenylalanine and Glycine Rich Nuclear Pores.

Glycine – amino acid

G-proteins – proteins with the ability to bind to and hydrolyze guanosine triphosphate (GTP) to guanosine diphosphate (GDP)

Guanine - nucleotide

HEAT Repeats – are binding domains for Ran, importins and exportins cargo transport proteins.

In vitro – in glass.

Karyopherin – family of proteins involved in the transport of macromolecules across the NPC.

karyoplasm – also known as nucleoplasm.

kDa – kilodaltons, unit of mass.

NES – nuclear export signal.

NLS – nuclear localisation signal.

NPC – nuclear pore complex.

Nucleoporins – proteins that make up the NPC.

Phenylalanine – amino acid

Ran - is a small G-protein roughly around 25 kDa that is essential for the dissociation of transport receptors/proteins or cargo complexes through the NPC.

ranBP1 - Ran-binding protein 1 is a class of proteins regulating the binding and hydrolysis of GTP by Ras-related proteins.

ranGAP - is a protein that carries out the transport of other proteins from the cytosol to the nucleus in eukaryotic cells.

Ras – a family of hydrolytic enzymes.

RCC1 or RanGEF - Regulator of chromosome condensation 1 is a human gene and protein that serves as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ran GTPase.


  1. Martin W Hetzer The nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol: 2010, 2(3);a000539 PubMed 20300205
  2. H G CALLAN, S G TOMLIN Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci.: 1950, 137(888);367-78 PubMed 14786306
  3. M L WATSON The nuclear envelope; its structure and relation to cytoplasmic membranes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol: 1955, 1(3);257-70 PubMed 13242591
  5. Darui Xu, Alicia Farmer, Yuh Min Chook Recognition of nuclear targeting signals by Karyopherin-β proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.: 2010, 20(6);782-90 PubMed 20951026
  6. Elissa P Lei, Pamela A Silver Protein and RNA export from the nucleus. Dev. Cell: 2002, 2(3);261-72 PubMed 11879632
  7. F Melchior, B Paschal, J Evans, L Gerace Inhibition of nuclear protein import by nonhydrolyzable analogues of GTP and identification of the small GTPase Ran/TC4 as an essential transport factor. J. Cell Biol.: 1993, 123(6 Pt 2);1649-59 PubMed 8276887
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 M P Rout, J D Aitchison, A Suprapto, K Hjertaas, Y Zhao, B T Chait The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol.: 2000, 148(4);635-51 PubMed 10684247
  9. 9.0 9.1 Kasper R Andersen, Evgeny Onischenko, Jeffrey H Tang, Pravin Kumar, James Z Chen, Alexander Ulrich, Jan T Liphardt, Karsten Weis, Thomas U Schwartz Scaffold nucleoporins Nup188 and Nup192 share structural and functional properties with nuclear transport receptors. Elife: 2013, 2;e00745 PubMed 23795296
  10. Valerie Le Sage, Andrew J Mouland Viral subversion of the nuclear pore complex. Viruses: 2013, 5(8);2019-42 PubMed 23959328
  11. A. V. Sorokin, E. R. Kim, and L. P. OvchinnikovREVIEW: Nucleocytoplasmic Transport of Proteins Institute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia URL:[1]
  12. 12.0 12.1 Alexander Goryaynov, Weidong Yang Role of molecular charge in nucleocytoplasmic transport. PLoS ONE: 2014, 9(2);e88792 PubMed 24558427
  13. Daniel P Denning, Samir S Patel, Vladimir Uversky, Anthony L Fink, Michael Rexach Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: the FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.: 2003, 100(5);2450-5 PubMed 12604785
  14. Sigrid Milles, Khanh Huy Bui, Christine Koehler, Mikhail Eltsov, Martin Beck, Edward A Lemke Facilitated aggregation of FG nucleoporins under molecular crowding conditions. EMBO Rep.: 2013, 14(2);178-83 PubMed 23238392
  15. 15.0 15.1 Nelly Panté, Michael Kann Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm. Mol. Biol. Cell: 2002, 13(2);425-34 PubMed 11854401
  16. J E Hinshaw, B O Carragher, R A Milligan Architecture and design of the nuclear pore complex. Cell: 1992, 69(7);1133-41 PubMed 1617726
  17. D Görlich, I W Mattaj Nucleocytoplasmic transport. Science: 1996, 271(5255);1513-8 PubMed 8599106
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Weidong Yang 'Natively unfolded' nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport: clustered or evenly distributed? Nucleus: 2010, 2(1);10-6 PubMed 21647294
  19. Maureen A Powers, Douglass J Forbes Nuclear transport: beginning to gel? Curr. Biol.: 2012, 22(23);R1006-9 PubMed 23218007
  20. Michael P Rout, John D Aitchison, Marcelo O Magnasco, Brian T Chait Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol.: 2003, 13(12);622-8 PubMed 14624840
  21. Joshua S Mincer, Sanford M Simon Simulations of nuclear pore transport yield mechanistic insights and quantitative predictions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.: 2011, 108(31);E351-8 PubMed 21690354
  22. R Moussavi-Baygi, Y Jamali, R Karimi, M R K Mofrad Biophysical coarse-grained modeling provides insights into transport through the nuclear pore complex. Biophys. J.: 2011, 100(6);1410-9 PubMed 21402022
  23. Jindriska Fiserova, Shane A Richards, Susan R Wente, Martin W Goldberg Facilitated transport and diffusion take distinct spatial routes through the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell. Sci.: 2010, 123(Pt 16);2773-80 PubMed 20647373
  24. 24.0 24.1 Nima Mosammaparast, Lucy F Pemberton Karyopherins: from nuclear-transport mediators to nuclear-function regulators. Trends Cell Biol.: 2004, 14(10);547-56 PubMed 15450977
  25. G Cingolani, C Petosa, K Weis, C W Müller Structure of importin-beta bound to the IBB domain of importin-alpha. Nature: 1999, 399(6733);221-9 PubMed 10353244
  26. 26.0 26.1 Makoto Kimura, Naoko Imamoto Biological significance of the importin-β family-dependent nucleocytoplasmic transport pathways. Traffic: 2014, 15(7);727-48 PubMed 24766099
  27. H Fried, U Kutay Nucleocytoplasmic transport: taking an inventory. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.: 2003, 60(8);1659-88 PubMed 14504656
  28. Elena Conti, Christoph W Müller, Murray Stewart Karyopherin flexibility in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.: 2006, 16(2);237-44 PubMed 16567089
  29. Yuh Min Chook, Katherine E Süel Nuclear import by karyopherin-βs: recognition and inhibition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta: 2011, 1813(9);1593-606 PubMed 21029754
  30. Mythili Suntharalingam, Susan R Wente Peering through the pore: nuclear pore complex structure, assembly, and function. Dev. Cell: 2003, 4(6);775-89 PubMed 12791264
  31. Murray Stewart Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.: 2007, 8(3);195-208 PubMed 17287812
  32. 32.0 32.1 Jozef Zienkiewicz, Amy Armitage, Jacek Hawiger Targeting nuclear import shuttles, importins/karyopherins alpha by a peptide mimicking the NFκB1/p50 nuclear localization sequence. J Am Heart Assoc: 2013, 2(5);e000386 PubMed 24042087
  33. M A Zanta, P Belguise-Valladier, J P Behr Gene delivery: a single nuclear localization signal peptide is sufficient to carry DNA to the cell nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.: 1999, 96(1);91-6 PubMed 9874777
  34. E Conti, J Kuriyan Crystallographic analysis of the specific yet versatile recognition of distinct nuclear localization signals by karyopherin alpha. Structure: 2000, 8(3);329-38 PubMed 10745017
  35. 35.0 35.1 L F Pemberton, G Blobel, J S Rosenblum Transport routes through the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.: 1998, 10(3);392-9 PubMed 9640541
  36. P Fanara, M R Hodel, A H Corbett, A E Hodel Quantitative analysis of nuclear localization signal (NLS)-importin alpha interaction through fluorescence depolarization. Evidence for auto-inhibitory regulation of NLS binding. J. Biol. Chem.: 2000, 275(28);21218-23 PubMed 10806202
  37. L F Pemberton, G Blobel, J S Rosenblum Transport routes through the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.: 1998, 10(3);392-9 PubMed 9640541
  38. N C Chi, E J Adam, G D Visser, S A Adam RanBP1 stabilizes the interaction of Ran with p97 nuclear protein import. J. Cell Biol.: 1996, 135(3);559-69 PubMed 8909533
  39. E Izaurralde, U Kutay, C von Kobbe, I W Mattaj, D Görlich The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J.: 1997, 16(21);6535-47 PubMed 9351834
  40. E Izaurralde, U Kutay, C von Kobbe, I W Mattaj, D Görlich The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J.: 1997, 16(21);6535-47 PubMed 9351834
  41. 41.0 41.1 41.2 Abigail M Fox, Danguole Ciziene, Stephen H McLaughlin, Murray Stewart Electrostatic interactions involving the extreme C terminus of nuclear export factor CRM1 modulate its affinity for cargo. J. Biol. Chem.: 2011, 286(33);29325-35 PubMed 21708948
  42. J Solsbacher, P Maurer, F R Bischoff, G Schlenstedt Cse1p is involved in export of yeast importin alpha from the nucleus. Mol. Cell. Biol.: 1998, 18(11);6805-15 PubMed 9774694
  43. Ivan K H Poon, David A Jans Regulation of nuclear transport: central role in development and transformation? Traffic: 2005, 6(3);173-86 PubMed 15702986
  44. P Askjaer, R Rosendahl, J Kjems Nuclear export of the DEAD box An3 protein by CRM1 is coupled to An3 helicase activity. J. Biol. Chem.: 2000, 275(16);11561-8 PubMed 10766770
  45. U Kutay, F R Bischoff, S Kostka, R Kraft, D Görlich Export of importin alpha from the nucleus is mediated by a specific nuclear transport factor. Cell: 1997, 90(6);1061-71 PubMed 9323134
  46. F R Bischoff, D Görlich RanBP1 is crucial for the release of RanGTP from importin beta-related nuclear transport factors. FEBS Lett.: 1997, 419(2-3);249-54 PubMed 9428644
  47. Xiuhua Dong, Anindita Biswas, Katherine E Süel, Laurie K Jackson, Rita Martinez, Hongmei Gu, Yuh Min Chook Structural basis for leucine-rich nuclear export signal recognition by CRM1. Nature: 2009, 458(7242);1136-41 PubMed 19339969
  48. 48.0 48.1 48.2 48.3 Ankita Aggarwal, Devendra K Agrawal Importins and exportins regulating allergic immune responses. Mediators Inflamm.: 2014, 2014;476357 PubMed 24733961
  49. Ivan K H Poon, David A Jans Regulation of nuclear transport: central role in development and transformation? Traffic: 2005, 6(3);173-86 PubMed 15702986
  50. F R Bischoff, H Ponstingl Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on Ran by the mitotic regulator RCC1. Nature: 1991, 354(6348);80-2 PubMed 1944575
  51. M V Nachury, K Weis The direction of transport through the nuclear pore can be inverted. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.: 1999, 96(17);9622-7 PubMed 10449743
  52. F Fagotto, U Glück, B M Gumbiner Nuclear localization signal-independent and importin/karyopherin-independent nuclear import of beta-catenin. Curr. Biol.: 1998, 8(4);181-90 PubMed 9501980
  53. L Shapiro The multi-talented beta-catenin makes its first appearance. Structure: 1997, 5(10);1265-8 PubMed 9351813
  54. F Yokoya, N Imamoto, T Tachibana, Y Yoneda beta-catenin can be transported into the nucleus in a Ran-unassisted manner. Mol. Biol. Cell: 1999, 10(4);1119-31 PubMed 10198061
  55. H S Malik, T H Eickbush, D S Goldfarb Evolutionary specialization of the nuclear targeting apparatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.: 1997, 94(25);13738-42 PubMed 9391096
  56. Joan Massagué, Joan Seoane, David Wotton Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev.: 2005, 19(23);2783-810 PubMed 16322555
  57. J A Riumallo, D Schoeller, G Barrera, V Gattas, R Uauy Energy expenditure in underweight free-living adults: impact of energy supplementation as determined by doubly labeled water and indirect calorimetry. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.: 1989, 49(2);239-46 PubMed 2916443
  58. Lan Xu, Yibin Kang, Seda Cöl, Joan Massagué Smad2 nucleocytoplasmic shuttling by nucleoporins CAN/Nup214 and Nup153 feeds TGFbeta signaling complexes in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Mol. Cell: 2002, 10(2);271-82 PubMed 12191473
  59. Naoya Hatano, Yoshiko Mori, Masatsugu Oh-hora, Atsushi Kosugi, Takahiko Fujikawa, Naoya Nakai, Hitoshi Niwa, Jun-ichi Miyazaki, Toshiyuki Hamaoka, Masato Ogata Essential role for ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinase in placental development. Genes Cells: 2003, 8(11);847-56 PubMed 14622137
  60. Angelique W Whitehurst, Julie L Wilsbacher, Youngjai You, Kate Luby-Phelps, Mary Shannon Moore, Melanie H Cobb ERK2 enters the nucleus by a carrier-independent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.: 2002, 99(11);7496-501 PubMed 12032311
  61. Y Matsubayashi, M Fukuda, E Nishida Evidence for existence of a nuclear pore complex-mediated, cytosol-independent pathway of nuclear translocation of ERK MAP kinase in permeabilized cells. J. Biol. Chem.: 2001, 276(45);41755-60 PubMed 11546808
  62. Aarati Ranganathan, Mustafa N Yazicioglu, Melanie H Cobb The nuclear localization of ERK2 occurs by mechanisms both independent of and dependent on energy. J. Biol. Chem.: 2006, 281(23);15645-52 PubMed 16595679
  63. 63.0 63.1 Andreas Marg, Ying Shan, Thomas Meyer, Torsten Meissner, Martin Brandenburg, Uwe Vinkemeier Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling by nucleoporins Nup153 and Nup214 and CRM1-dependent nuclear export control the subcellular distribution of latent Stat1. J. Cell Biol.: 2004, 165(6);823-33 PubMed 15210729
  64. Thomas Meyer, Uwe Vinkemeier Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of STAT transcription factors. Eur. J. Biochem.: 2004, 271(23-24);4606-12 PubMed 15606747
  65. J Markos, B P Mullan, D R Hillman, A W Musk, V F Antico, F T Lovegrove, M J Carter, K E Finucane Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.: 1989, 139(4);902-10 PubMed 2930068
  66. M Fornerod, J van Deursen, S van Baal, A Reynolds, D Davis, K G Murti, J Fransen, G Grosveld The human homologue of yeast CRM1 is in a dynamic subcomplex with CAN/Nup214 and a novel nuclear pore component Nup88. EMBO J.: 1997, 16(4);807-16 PubMed 9049309
  67. Yu Ti Cheng, Hugo Germain, Marcel Wiermer, Dongling Bi, Fang Xu, Ana V García, Lennart Wirthmueller, Charles Després, Jane E Parker, Yuelin Zhang, Xin Li Nuclear pore complex component MOS7/Nup88 is required for innate immunity and nuclear accumulation of defense regulators in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell: 2009, 21(8);2503-16 PubMed 19700630
  68. David Agudo, Francisco Gómez-Esquer, Fernando Martínez-Arribas, Mariá José Núñez-Villar, Marina Pollán, José Schneider Nup88 mRNA overexpression is associated with high aggressiveness of breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer: 2004, 109(5);717-20 PubMed 14999780
  69. Tobias M Franks, Martin W Hetzer The role of Nup98 in transcription regulation in healthy and diseased cells. Trends Cell Biol.: 2013, 23(3);112-7 PubMed 23246429
  70. M A Powers, D J Forbes, J E Dahlberg, E Lund The vertebrate GLFG nucleoporin, Nup98, is an essential component of multiple RNA export pathways. J. Cell Biol.: 1997, 136(2);241-50 PubMed 9015297
  71. Sheryl M Gough, Christopher I Slape, Peter D Aplan NUP98 gene fusions and hematopoietic malignancies: common themes and new biologic insights. Blood: 2011, 118(24);6247-57 PubMed 21948299
  72. von Kobbe C, van Deursen JM, J P Rodrigues, D Sitterlin, A Bachi, X Wu, M Wilm, M Carmo-Fonseca, E Izaurralde Vesicular stomatitis virus matrix protein inhibits host cell gene expression by targeting the nucleoporin Nup98. Mol. Cell: 2000, 6(5);1243-52 PubMed 11106761
  73. 73.0 73.1 Kurt E Gustin, Peter Sarnow Inhibition of nuclear import and alteration of nuclear pore complex composition by rhinovirus. J. Virol.: 2002, 76(17);8787-96 PubMed 12163599
  74. Doris M Kraemer, Hans-Peter Tony Nuclear Pore Protein p62 Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Open Rheumatol J: 2010, 4;24-7 PubMed 20648220
  75. L I Davis, G Blobel Nuclear pore complex contains a family of glycoproteins that includes p62: glycosylation through a previously unidentified cellular pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.: 1987, 84(21);7552-6 PubMed 3313397
  76. Kyrill Schwarz-Herion, Bohumil Maco, Ursula Sauder, Birthe Fahrenkrog Domain topology of the p62 complex within the 3-D architecture of the nuclear pore complex. J. Mol. Biol.: 2007, 370(4);796-806 PubMed 17544442
  77. J Wesierska-Gadek, H Hohenuer, E Hitchman, E Penner Autoantibodies against nucleoporin p62 constitute a novel marker of primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology: 1996, 110(3);840-7 PubMed 8608894
  78. Gianluigi Zaza, Federica Rascio, Paola Pontrelli, Simona Granata, Patrizia Stifanelli, Matteo Accetturo, Nicola Ancona, Loreto Gesualdo, Antonio Lupo, Giuseppe Grandaliano Karyopherins: potential biological elements involved in the delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients. BMC Med Genomics: 2014, 7;14 PubMed 24625024
  79. Caterina Strambio-De-Castilla Jumping over the fence: RNA nuclear export revisited. Nucleus: 2013, 4(2);95-9 PubMed 23528257